On contrastive relations in academic spoken discourse

Autoři:

V časopise:

Ročník: 
35

Vydavatel:

Místo vydání:

Rok vydání:

Strany: 
93-105
ISBN/ISSN: 
0524-6881 (vyhledej v knihovnách)
1805-0867 (vyhledej v knihovnách)

Typ publikace:

Jazyk:

Klíčová slova:

Kapitoly v mluvnici:

Typ záznamu:

Abstrakt: 

Contrastive relations between successive or more distant segments of discourse rank among the most informative semantic relations in both spoken and written English (cf. Kortmann 1991) since they create important cohesive links and thus contribute to the establishing of discourse coherence. The author investigates authentic texts from four different types of speech situations representing academic spoken discourse (MICASE) while searching for discourse markers (DMs) expressing contrastive relations. Her aim is to describe the ways in which selected markers are used by native speakers of American English to form coherent discourse.

Bibliografie: 

Altenberg, Bengt (1986) ‘Contrastive Linking in Spoken and Written English’. In: Gunnel Tottie and Ingegerd Bäcklund (eds.). English in Speech and Writing. A Symposium. Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksell, 13-40.
de Beaugrande, Robert and Wolfgang U. Dressler (1981) Introduction to Text Linguistics. London: Longman.
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad, and Edward Finegan (1999) Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.
Bublitz, Wolfram (1997) ‘Introduction: Views on Coherence’. In: Wolfram Bublitz, Uta Lenk, and Eija Ventola (eds). Coherence in Spoken and Written Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1-7.
Bublitz, Wolfram (1988) Supportive Fellow-Speakers and Cooperative Conversations. Discourse Topics and Topical Actions. Participant Roles and ‘Recipient’ Action on a Particular Type of Everyday Conversation. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Dontcheva-Navratilova, Olga (2009) ‘Evaluation in Non-Native Writer’s Academic Discourse: Stance Devices’. In: Světlana Hanušová a kol. Research in English Teacher Education. Brno: Masaryk University, 33-42.
Dušková, Libuše et al. (1988) Mluvnice současné angličtiny na pozadí češtiny. Praha: Academia.
Fraser, Bruce (1990) ‘An Approach to Discourse Markers’. Journal of Pragmatics 14, 383-395.
Fraser, Bruce (1998) ‘Contrastive Discourse Markers in English.’ In: Andreas H. Junker and Yael Ziv (eds.). Discourse Markers. Description and Theory. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 301-326.
Fraser, Bruce (1999) ‘What are Discourse Markers?’ Journal of Pragmatics 31, 931-952.
Haberlandt, Karl (1982) ‘Reader Expectations in Text Comprehension’. In: J.-F, Le Ny and W. Kintsch (eds.) Language and Comprehension. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 239-249.
Halliday, Michael A. K. and Ruqaiya Hasan (1989) Language, Context, and Text: Aspects of Language in a Social-Semiotic Perspective. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hůlková, Irena (2005) ‘Linking Devices in English Academic Prose’. In: Renata Povolná and Olga Dontcheva-Navratilova (eds.). Discourse and Interaction 1. Brno Seminar on Linguistic Studies in English: Proceedings. Sborník prací Pedagogické fakulty Masarykovy univerzity v Brně. Vol. 187. Brno: Masaryk University, 53-60.
Kortmann, Bernd (1991) Free Adjuncts and Absolutes in English. London: Routledge.
Leech, Geoffrey and Jan Svartvik (1994) A Communicative Grammar of English. 2nd ed. London: Longman.
Leech, Geoffrey (1989) An A-Z of English Grammar & Usage. London: Nelson.
Leech, Geoffrey and Jan Svartvik (1994) A Communicative Grammar of English. 2nd ed. London: Longman.
Malá, Markéta (2006) ‘Contrastive Markers and Dialogicality’. In: Renata Povolná and Olga Dontcheva-Navratilova (eds.). Discourse and Interaction 2. Sborník prací Pedagogické fakulty Masarykovy univerzity. Vol. 198. Brno: Masaryk University, 97-107.
Mey, Jacob (2001) Pragmatics. An Introduction. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, and Jan Svartvik (1985) A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.
Povolná, Renata (2007) ‘Aspects of Coherence in Spoken Discourse’. In: Josef Schmied, Christoph Haase, and Renata Povolná (eds.). Complexity and Coherence: Approaches to Linguistic Research and Language Teaching. REAL Studies 3. Göttingen: Cuvillier Verlag, 107-125.
Povolná, Renata (2009) ‘Exploring Interactive Discourse Markers in Academic Spoken Discourse’. In: Olga Dontcheva-Navratilova and Renata Povolná (eds.). Coherence and Cohesion in Spoken and Written Discourse. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 60-80.
Povolná, Renata (2008) ‘Why Are There So Many Labels for Discourse Markers?’ Discourse and Interaction 1/1. Brno: Masaryk University, 115-124.
Seidlhofer, Barbara and Henry G. Widdowson (1997) ‘Coherence in Summary: The Contexts of Appropriate Discourse’. In: Wolfram Bublitz, Uta Lenk, and Eija Ventola (eds.). Coherence in Spoken and Written Discourse. How to Create it and How to Describe it. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 205-219.
Schiffrin, Deborah (1987) Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sinclair, John M. et al. (1987) Collins COBUILD English Language Dictionary. London: Collins.
Stubbs, Michael (1983) Discourse Analysis: The Sociolinguistic Analysis of Natural Language. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Taboada, Maite (2006) ‘Discourse Markers as Signals (or Not) of Rhetorical Relations’. Journal of Pragmatics 38/4, 567-592.
Urbanová, Ludmila (2008) Stylistika anglického jazyka. Brno: Barrister & Principal.
Widdowson, Henry G. (1979) Explorations in Applied Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.