Constancy of syntactic function across languages

Editoři:

Číslo v edici: 
49

Vydavatel:

Místo vydání:

Rok vydání:

Strany: 
127-144
ISBN/ISSN: 

Typ publikace:

Jazyk:

Kontakt: 
libuse.duskova@ff.cuni.cz
Abstrakt: 

In the present paper constancy of syntactic function is understood as identical syntactic representation of a lexical item and its lexical equivalent in parallel texts taken from two (or more) different languages. Syntactic constancy conceived in this way is examined between English and Czech on the basis of original English texts and their Czech translations, and vice versa. Both instances of syntactic correspondence and instances of syntactic divergence are taken into account.
The proposed analysis is based on the assumption that syntactic structure is hierarchically subordinate to the information structure (functional sentence perspective, FSP henceforth); that is, given the universal validity of the principle of end focus, a translated text is assumed to present (or at least to show a tendency to present) the meaning content in the same perspective as the original, with changes in the syntactic structure, if need be, according to the respective grammatical rules. Accordingly, attention is focused on instances of syntactic divergence, which are examined with a view to ascertaining the underlying factors of the divergence.

Bibliografie: 

Čermáková, M. 1999 Větněčlenské korespondence podmětu mezi angličtinou a češtinou (Syntactic counterparts of the subject between English and Czech). Prague: Charles University, Philosophical Faculty.
Dušková, L. 1975 "On some semantic and FSP aspects of the subject in Czech and in English". Philologica Pragensia 18: 199-221. Reprinted in Dušková 1999, Chapter 32.
Dušková, L. 1986 "A note on the thematic character of the subject in English in comparison with Czech". In Prague Studies in Mathematical Linguistics 9: 95-102. Prague: Academia. Reprinted in Dušková 1999, Chapter 33.
Dušková, L. 1998 "Syntactic realizations of the presentation scale". Linguistica Pragensia 8: 36-43.
Dušková, L. 1999a Studies in the English Language. Part 2. Prague: Karolinum — Charles University Press.
Dušková, L. 1999b "Basic distribution of communicative dynamism vs. nonlinear indication of functional sentence perspective". In E. Hajičová, T. Hoskovec, O. Leška, P. Sgall and Z. Skoumalová (eds), Travaux du Cercle linguistique de Prague NS 3, Prague Linguistic Circle Papers. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 249-261.
Firbas, J. 1966 "Non-thematic subjects in contemporary English". In Travaux linguistiques de Prague 2: 239-256. Prague: Academia.
Firbas, J. 1992 Functional Sentence Perspective in Written and Spoken Communication. Cam-bridge: University Press.
Klégr.A. 1996 The Noun in Translation. Acta Universitatis Carolinae Philologica, Mono- graphia CXXVII - 1995. Prague: Karolinum — Charles University Press.
Mathesius, V. 1947 "O funkci podmětu" (On the function of the subject). In Čeština a obecný jazykozpyt. Prague: Melantrich, 277-285.
Nekvapilová, S. 1998 Větněčlenské korespondence podmětu mezi angličtinou a němčinou (Syntactic counterparts of the subject between English and German). Prague: Charles University, Philosophical Faculty.
Uhlířová, L. 1974 "On the role of statistics in the investigation of FSP". In F. Daneš (ed), Papers on Functional Sentence Perspective. Prague: Academia, 208-216.